嗜铬粒蛋白A对危重病人预后的评估作用:一个ICU中的队列研究

张丹1
重庆医科大学附属第一医院急诊科中心ICU

 

Abstract

Background : Risk assessment of patients should be based on objective variables that can be routinely measured, like biological markers. Acute response to stress results in release of catecholamines from the adrenal medulla, together with chromogranin A (CGA). To date no study has yet been carried out to evaluate the prognostic value of CGA in patients of intensive care units.

Methods: We conducted a prospective study in such patients to measure serum procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) and CGA obtained at admission. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the ability of these biomarkers to predict mortality.

Results: In 120 consecutive patients a positive correlation was found between CGA and CRP (r²=0.216, p=0.02) and PCT (r²=0.396, p<0.001) and Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II (SAPS II) (r²=0.438, p<0.001) and Logistic Organ Dysfunction System (LODS) (r²=0.374, p<0.001). Non survivors had significantly higher CGA and PCT values than survivors (median (interquartile range) of 293.0 ng/mL (163.5–699.5) versus 86.0 ng/mL (53.8–175.3) for CGA, and 6.78 ng/mL (2.39–22.92) versus 0.54 ng/mL (0.16–6.28) for PCT, p<0.001). In multivariable linear regression analysis, creatinine (p<0.001), age (p<0.001) and SAPS II (p=0.002) were the only independent variables predicting CGA levels (r²=0.352). In multivariate analysis, 3 independent factors were involved in death prediction: log-normalized CGA levels (hazard ratio (HR)=7.248, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.004–17.487), SAPS II (HR=1.046, 95%CI 1.026–1.067) and cardiogenic shock (HR=3.920, 95%CI 1.731–8.880).

Conclusions: CGA is a strong and independent indicator of prognosis in non surgical critically ill patients.

 

嗜铬粒蛋白A对危重病人预后的评估作用:一个ICU中的队列研究
 
背景:临床中用一些可测量客观参数,如生物学标志物评估患者的风险。在应激状况下,肾上髓质分泌儿茶酚胺的同时分泌CGA。
 
方法:至今为止,还没有用CGA评估ICU患者预后的研究。在我们的前瞻性研究中,我们测量了入院时患者的血浆降钙素原(PCT),C-反应蛋白(CRP)和CGA水平,单因素和多因素分析这些指标预测患者死亡的能力。
 
结果:120个连续入院的ICU患者中,发现CGA和CRP(r2=0.216,p=0.02)、PCT(r2=0.396,p<0.001)、简明急性生理评分II(SAPSII)(r2=0.438,p<0.001)和Logistic器官功能障碍系统(LODS)(r2=0.374,p<0.001)正相关。死亡组的CGA和PCT明显比存活组高(CGA为293.0ng/ml(163.5-699.5)比0.54ng/ml(0.16-6.28);PCT为6.78ng/ml(2.39-22.92)比0.54ng/ml(163.5-699.5), p<0.001)。多因素线性回归分析结果提示血肌酐(p<0.001),年龄(p<0.001)和SAPSII(p=0.002)是与CGA相关的参数(r2=0.352);多因素分析结果提示,和死亡相关的3个独立因素:CGA水平(危险比率HR=7.248,95%可信区间(CI)3.004-17.487),SAPSII(HR=1.046,95%CI 1.026-1.067)和心源性休克(HR=3.920,95%CI 1.731-8.880)。
 
结论:CGA是非外科性危重患者的有力的判断预后的独立指标。